We Believe in CLT, But…’: Iranian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions and Implementation Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.2058Keywords:
Communicative Language Teaching, EFL teachers, teacher cognition, implementation barriers, Sociocultural theoryAbstract
Despite its official adoption in Iran’s national EFL curriculum, Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) remains inconsistently implemented, revealing a profound disconnect between policy mandates and classroom realities. This mixed-methods study examines the perceptions of 35 Iranian EFL teachers (15 pre-service, 20 in-service) in Isfahan, using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, to explore their conceptualizations of CLT, perceived barriers to its enactment, and the resulting belief-practice gap. Findings demonstrate robust theoretical support for CLT principles across both cohorts, yet their practical application is severely constrained. Common obstacles include grammar-focused national examinations, large class sizes, students’ ingrained passive learning habits, scarcity of authentic materials, and insufficient teacher training. In-service teachers further highlight systemic barriers—misaligned assessment systems, inadequate administrative support, and low salaries—whereas pre-service teachers, limited by minimal classroom exposure, display greater optimism. Framed through Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, the study positions teachers as active agents mediating conflicting institutional and cultural demands. It contends that sustainable CLT integration demands policy coherence, sustained professional development, and context-sensitive adaptations rather than relying solely on top-down reform. By providing a comparative analysis across career stages, this research advances teacher cognition scholarship and reframes CLT as a locally negotiated practice, offering direct implications for teacher education, curriculum design, and policymaking in comparable EFL contexts.
Downloads
References
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Breen, M. P., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers' principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 355-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.4.470
Brookhart, S. M. (2023). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Burnaby, B., & Sun, Y. (1989). Chinese teachers' views of Western language teaching: Context informs paradigms. TESOL Quarterly, 23(2), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587334
Burns, A. (2000). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Cabaroglu, N., & Roberts, J. (2000). Development in student teachers' pre-existing beliefs during a 1-year PGCE programme. System, 28(3), 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00019-1
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language learning and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1
Cochran-Smith, M. (2022). Becoming critical teacher educators. Routledge.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond uncertainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In New directions in teacher education (pp. 11-30). Teachers College Press.
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 3-28). Sage
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Ellis, R. (2022). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Gamal, H., & Debra, A. (2001). The communicative approach in Egyptian classrooms: Teachers' perspectives [Unpublished manuscript].
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Guskey, T. R. (2022). Professional development for teachers: What works? Corwin.
Hattie, J. (2024). Visible learning and the science of how we learn (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003430124-11
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge University Press.
Humphries, S., & Burns, A. (2015). 'In reality, it's almost impossible': CLT-oriented curriculum change. ELT Journal, 69(3), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu081
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
Iskandar,Y., & Priyana,Y. (2024). Relationship between teacher burnout, job satisfaction, and student achievement in middle schools: A case study in Cianjur, Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi Wijaya Putra (Psikowipa), 5(2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.38156/psikowipa.v5i2.119
Jamalzadeh,M., & Shahsavar,Z. (2015). The effects of contextual factors on teachers' beliefs and practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.024
Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264518
Karavas-Doukas,E. (1996). Using attitude scales to investigate teachers' attitudes to the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 50(3), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.187
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2023). Becoming a teacher educator: The development of teacher educators' professional identity. Springer.
Koosha, M. & Yakhabi, M. (2013). Problems associated with the use of communicative language teaching in EFL contexts and possible solutions. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 63-76.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1np6r2
Lam,R. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: Surveying knowledge, conceptions, and practices of classroom-based writing assessment in Hong Kong. System, 81, 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.006
Lestari,C., & Margana,M. (2019). The effectiveness of content-based instruction and task-based instruction in teaching writing. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation (ICERI 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/iceri-18.2019.75
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Mangubhai,F., Marland,P., Dashwood,A., & Son,J. (2005). Similarities and differences in teachers' and researchers' conceptions of communicative language teaching: Does the use of an educational model cast a better light? Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 31-66. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr153oa
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Norouzpour,F., & Pourmohammadi,M. (2021). The effect of job satisfaction on teachers' creativity in using subsidiary materials in learning English in Iranian English institutes. Modern Perspectives in Language, Literature and Education Vol. 4, 65-72. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mplle/v4/7377D
Pajares,M.F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Penner, J. (1995). Change and conflict: Introduction of the communicative approach in China. TESL Canada Journal, 12(2), 01. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v12i2.649
Rao,Z. (2002). Chinese students' perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in the EFL classroom. System, 30(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00050-1
Richards, J. C. (1993). Beyond the textbook: The role of commercial materials in language teaching. RELC Journal, 24(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829302400101
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2021). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Sheikhol-Eslami, F., & Allami, H. (2012). The relation between teachers' self-beliefs of L2 learning and in-class practices. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1684-1692 https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.8.1684-1692
Silva, M. d. (2005). Constructing the teaching process from the inside out: How pre-service teachers make sense of their perceptions of the teaching of the four skills. TESL-EJ, 9(2), Article 1. http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej34/a1.pdf
Sifakis, N. C. (2023). Post-method pedagogy and the future of language teaching. Routledge.
Timperley, H. (2024). Teacher professional learning and development: A global perspective. Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
2025-09-03 14:34:53
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
