Project-Based Learning as a catalyst for Students and Teacher Autonomy development: The experience in a State School in Nilo, Cundinamarca.
This paper reports the findings of a graduation thesis which intended to identify the effects that Project-Based Learning implementation had on the development of autonomy of a group of tenth grade English language learners and their teacher. In this Action Research study, several instruments were used. An initial questionnaire to confirm perceptions; a student´s attitude scale to assess how students worked, both individually and in small groups; small group conferencing, which enabled students to speak about their projects; a teacher-research journal with teacher´s reflections on the implementation and effectiveness of the action strategies; and students´ journals containing reflections on the different stages of the process. The data gathered showed that PBL work led to both learners and their teacher having more positive attitudes and behaviors towards their own academic activities and teaching practice, respectively. This methodology encouraged learners to become decision makers, to gain responsibility and confidence, and to raise awareness of their role in the classroom, while also promoting the development of several features of the teacher´s teaching style. Thus, knowledge in the classroom was built cooperatively.
Allen, L. & Calhoun, E. (1998). Schoolwide Action Research: findings from six years of study, Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1), 706-710.
Benson, P. & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy and independence in Language learning. London, UK: Longman.
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958
Burns, A. (2010). Collaborative Action Research for English Teachers. In K. Dikilitaş & C.
Griffiths, Developing Language Teacher Autonomy through Action Research. Switzerland:Palgrave-Macmillan.
Cotterall, S. & Crabbe, D. (Eds.). (1999). Learner autonomy in language learning: Defining the field and effecting change. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02293-3
Fried-Booth, D. L. (1997). Project work. (8th Ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fried-Booth, D. L. (2002). Project work. (2nd Ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holec, H. (1985). On Autonomy: some elementary concepts. In Riley, P. (Ed.), Discourse and Learning. London: Longman.
Jhonson, A. P. (2008). A short guide to action research, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Kyngas H. & Vanhanen L. (1999). Content analysis. Hoitotiede Journal, 1(1), 3-12.
Lamb, T.E. & Reinders, H. (Eds.) (2008). Learner and teacher autonomy: concepts, realities, and responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.1
Little, D. (1991). Autonomy: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.
Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: the dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6
Little, D. (2000). Learner autonomy: why foreign languages should occupy a central role in the curriculum. In R.C. Smith, Teacher education for teacher-learner autonomy. Symposium for Language Teacher Educators: Papers from Three IALS Symposia (CD-ROM). Edinburgh: IALS, University of Edinburgh.
Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Railsback, J. (2002). Project-Based Instruction: Creating Excitement for Learning. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Smith, R. C. (2001). Teacher education for teacher-learner autonomy. Retrieved on November 28, 2017, from http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~elsdr/Teacher_autonomy.pdf
Stoller, F. (2002). Project Work: A Means to Promote Language and Content. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching. An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190.016
Tort-Moloney, D. (1997). Teacher Autonomy: A Vygotskian Theoretical Framework. Dublin, Ireland: Centre for Language and Communication studies
Copyright (c) 2019 GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal uses Crossref's Cited-By and Reference Linking, so that we can display the citations registered in Crossref here.
This document does not have Crossref citations yet.