The Reciprocal Teaching Model in the Development of Writing in Tenth Graders

Keywords: Curriculum, Reciprocal Teaching Model, reading strategies, portfolios, writing

Abstract

This article presents an action research study which purpose was to determine the extent to which the Reciprocal Teaching model (RT), proposed by Palincscar and Brown (1984), impacts tenth grader’s English writing skills. The research work included: (1) A diagnostic stage to determine the participant’s initial difficulties in regards to their writing skills; (2) An action stage that consisted of the implementation of some workshops based on the RT model and focused on reading strategies, namely predicting, clarifying, questioning, and summarizing. (3) An evaluation stage where key findings indicated the usefulness of RT for building confidence in the students and for developing their writing skills as they were able to expand their vocabulary spectrum, reduce syntax errors, and improve the content, organization and punctuation of their writing. Findings also suggest that assessing writing performance through portfolios is useful to enhance the school curriculum because students engaged in their own learning and participated actively in their learning process.

       Keywords: curriculum, Reciprocal Teaching Model, reading strategies, portfolios, writing.

Author Biographies

Karen Julio Cárdenas, Universidad de Caldas, Colombia

holds an M.A. in English Didactics from Universidad de Caldas and a Bachelor's degree in Foreign Languages, English/French from Universidad de Pamplona. She is currently a full-time English teacher at Fulgencio Lequerica Velez public school in Cartagena, Colombia. Also, she is a thesis advisor for the Master program in English Didactics at Universidad de Caldas. She has been involved in both, national and international teacher development programs. She was awarded the Indian Technical & Economic Cooperation (ITEC) scholarship, a fully-funded program run by the Government of India and supported by the Colombian Ministry of Education. She worked as an ITEC scholar at the English and Foreign Language University (EFLU) in Hyderabad, India. Her research interest is in the area of teaching methodologies with a focus on teaching English language to adolescents.

Margarita María López-Pinzón, Universidad de Caldas, Colombia

Professor Margarita López holds an MA in English Didactics from Caldas University and  is currently the Director of this graduate Program; she has extensive experience in teaching graduate and undergraduate courses and has been conducting educational research for several years, her areas of interest include EFL methodogy, research and bilingualism.

References

Anderson, R., Spiro, R., & Montague, W. (1977). Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Bae, J. (2011). Teaching Process Writing for Intermediate/Advanced Learners in South Korea. Wisconsin, United States: University of Wisconsin-River Falls.

Brown, H.D. (1994) Teaching byprinciples: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Up-per Saddle, N.J.: Prentice Hall

Burns, A. (1999)Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press

Cozby, P. C. (1997). Methods in behavioral research (6th ed.).Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

Durukan, E. (2017, My 15). Effects of cooperative integrated reading composition (CIRC) technique on reading-writing skills. Retrieved from Educational Research and Reviews: http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR

Ferrance, E. (2000). Action Research. Brown University.

Gregg, L. W., & Steinberg, E. R. (1980). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Hacker, D. J. (1998). Metacognition: Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C.

Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Hansen, J. (1981). The Effects of Inference Training and Practice on Young Children"s Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(3), 391-417. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from the Jstor database.

https://doi.org/10.2307/747409

Harmer, J (2007). How to Teach English. Pearson Education Limited: Essex, England

https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn029

Harris, R. (2000). Rethinking Writing. London: Athlone Press.

Krashen, S. (1984). Writing: Research, theory, and applications. Oxford: Pergamon.

Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Langer, J., & Applebee, A. (1986). Reading and writing instruction: Toward a theory of teaching and learning, Review of Research in Education.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1167222

Lewin, K. (2006). Origins of Action Research. Educational Action Research.

Lubliner, S. (2004). Help for Struggling Upper-Grade Elementary Readers. The Reading Teacher, 57(5), p430-438, 9p. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from the ERICEBSCO database.

Moya, S. S. and J. M. O'Malley. (1994), A portfolio assessment model for ESL. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students , 13, pp. 13-36.

Murcia, M. C. (2001). Teaching English as a Second or or Foreign Language (3rd. Edition). Copyright by Heinle, a dicvision of Thomson learning Inc.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Oczuks, L. (2003). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Palincsar, A. (1986). Reciprocal teaching. In Teaching reading as thinking. In O. Brook, North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 117-175.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

Pearson, P., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction (pp. 815-860). White Plains, NY: . In M. K. R. Barr, Handbook of reading research: Volume II (pp. 815-860). Longman Publishing.

Richards, J., & Renandya, W. (2002). Methodology In Language Teaching. An anthology of current Practice. Cambridge : Cambridge university press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190

Saddler, B., & Andrade, H. (2004). The writing Rubric. In B. Saddler, & H. Andrade, Educational Leadership (pp. 48-52). Alenxandria, United States: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Devepment.

Schools, T. B. (2017, 06 1). The wriitng process. Retrieved from The writing process: https://www.bcps.org/offices/lis/writing/secondary/process.html

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Williams, J. (2010). Taking on the role of questioner: Revisiting reciprocal teaching. The Reading Teacher, 278-281.

https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.4.6

Published
2019-12-12
How to Cite
Julio Cárdenas, K., & López-Pinzón, M. M. (2019). The Reciprocal Teaching Model in the Development of Writing in Tenth Graders. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, (19), 128-147. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.801