Social Presence in an Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) in English during Covid-19

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.967

Keywords:

Covid-19, social presence, Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT), teaching English

Abstract

Many educational institutions had to move their face-to-face modality to online modality in a sudden way due to coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). On this reflection a foreign language teacher describes his social experience in an Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) when he moved his face-to-face classes to online ones. Based on Rourke et al. (2001) and Swan (2019), three elements were found on his online experience: cohesive teaching strategies, affective teaching strategies, and interactive teaching experiences. Asking for students’ mental health, giving advice, and keeping the video on were some of the strategies used. Conclusions suggest that it is vital to introduce people as human beings and touch their own realities during Covid-19 times. Recommendations include not only assessment practices such as take home exams, self-assessment and peer-assessment, but also monitor the ongoing process during emergency times.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sergio Alonso Lopera, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia

PhD and MA in linguistics; specialist in teaching foreign languages. His research interests involve teaching EFL reading comprehension and pragmatics. He is a member of the research group EALE (Enseñanza y Aprendizaje en Lenguas Extranjeras) and a full time professor at Universidad de Antioquia (Medellín - Colombia).

References

Bengtsson, L. (2019). Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci., 9(4), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040267

Blessinger, P., & Bliss, T. J. (2016). Introduction to open education: Towards a human rights theory, Open Education: International Perspectives in High Education. Cambridge, Reino Unido, Openbook Publishers, 11-30. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0103.01

Brand, A. (2007). Motivational orientations in under-researched FLL contexts: Findings from Indonesia. RELC Journal, 38(3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688207085849

Burden, P. (2004). An examination of attitude change towards the use of Japanese in a university English 'conversation' class. Class, 35(1), 21 - 36. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820403500104

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: a pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.5070/L462005216

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. United States: Pearson - Prentice Hall.

Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001315X

Engin, A. O. (2009). Second language learning success and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(8), 1035-1041. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.8.1035

Esani, M. (2010). Moving from face-to face to online teaching. Educational Technology 23(3), 187-190. https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.23.3.187

Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Instituto Cervantes, (2002). Enfoque comunicativo. Retrieved from https://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/diccio_ele/diccionario/enfoquecomunicativo.htm

Kayaoğlu, M. (2012). The use of mother tongue in foreign language teaching from teachers' practice and perspective. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 32 (II), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE492

Krashen, S. D. (1981). Bilingual education and second language acquisition theory. Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework, 51-79.

Li, F. (2015). Teaching and learning English by doing. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(5), 156-162.

Likitrattanaporn, W. (2017). The development of English language teaching skills for graduate students through the process of learning by doing. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 96-103. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p96

Mykota, D. and Duncan, R. (2007). Learning characteristics as predictors of online social presence. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(1), 157-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/20466630

Nokukhanya, N., Chuks, E. & Masuku, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education during Covid-19: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n5p1

Picón-Jácome, E. (2013). La rúbrica y la justicia en evaluación. Ikala, 18(3), 79-94.

Redmon, P. (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: pedagogical transitions. Proceedings Ascile 2011 Hobart, 1050-1060.

Rourke, L., T. Anderson, D. R. Garrison, and W. Archer (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education 14(2), pp. 50.

Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79

Savignon, S. (2001). Communicative language teaching for the twenty-first century. In: Celce-Murcia, Marianne (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. (pp. 13-28). Heinle & Heinle, Boston.

Shohamy, E. (2001). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, 18(4), 373-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800404

Stake, R. (1998). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1738-1747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014

Swan, K. (2019). Social presence in online learning. What's the big deal? Retrieved from https://es.slideshare.net/alexandrapickett/karen-swan-social-presence-in-online-learning-whats-the-big-deal

Swan, K. & Shih, L-F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i3.1788

Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4

Yin, R. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods, (3rd ed) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications

Downloads

Published

2021-12-17

How to Cite

Lopera, S. A. (2021). Social Presence in an Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) in English during Covid-19. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 23, 169–182. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.967